Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the optimal preconditioning regimen for the wound healing therapeutic efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs). To this end, we compared various preconditioning regimens for both the quantitative and qualitative production of MSC-derived EVs, and their therapeutic efficacy for proangiogenic activity in vitro and cutaneous wound healing in vivo. After preconditioning with thrombin (40 U), H2O2 (50 μM), lipopolysaccharide (1 μg/mL), or hypoxia (10% O2), EV secretion was assessed quantitatively by measuring production per cell and protein quantification, and qualitatively by measuring a proteome profiler and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) contained within EVs. The therapeutic efficacy of EVs was assessed in vitro by proliferation, migration and tube formation assays of human umbilical cord blood endothelial cells (HUVECs), and in vivo by quantification of cutaneous wound healing. Thrombin preconditioning optimally boosted EV production and enriched various growth factors including vascular endothelial growth factor and angiogenin contained within EVs compared to other preconditioning regimens. Thrombin preconditioning optimally enhanced proliferation, the migration and tube formation of HUVECs in vitro via pERK1/2 and pAKT signaling pathways, and cutaneous wound healing in vivo compared to other preconditioning regimens. Thrombin preconditioning exhibited optimal therapeutic efficacy compared with other preconditioning regimens in promoting proangiogenic activity in vitro and in enhancing cutaneous wound healing in vivo. These preconditioning regimen-dependent variations in therapeutic efficacy might be mediated by boosting EV production and enriching their cargo content.

Highlights

  • Cutaneous wound healing is a complex but well-orchestrated sequential process including coagulation and hemostasis, cell migration, inflammation, angiogenesis, proliferation and remodeling [1,2]

  • Stem cell therapy, especially using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), has emerged as a promising new and effective therapeutic strategy for treating chronic non-healing wounds, and this protective effect was predominantly mediated by paracrine rather than direct regenerative mechanisms [8,9]

  • Recent studies have demonstrated that the beneficial effects of MSCs for wound healing were only some mediated by the secretion of extracellular vesicles (EVs), nuclear membrane vesicles 40–100 nm in diameter and containing numerous proteins, lipids, mRNAs, and regulatory miRNAs [9,10]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cutaneous wound healing is a complex but well-orchestrated sequential process including coagulation and hemostasis, cell migration, inflammation, angiogenesis, proliferation and remodeling [1,2]. Recent studies have demonstrated that the beneficial effects of MSCs for wound healing were only some mediated by the secretion of extracellular vesicles (EVs), nuclear membrane vesicles 40–100 nm in diameter and containing numerous proteins, lipids, mRNAs, and regulatory miRNAs [9,10]. Since this cell-free therapy can bypass concerns associated with viable MSC transplantation, the use of MSC-derived EVs might be a promising new, safe, and effective therapeutic modality for cutaneous wound healing. We evaluated whether preconditioning regimen-dependent variations in therapeutic efficacies were associated with or mediated by boosting EV production and enriching EV content by measuring the amount of EV secretion quantitatively and by measuring a proteome profiler and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) contained within EVs qualitatively

Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Preconditioning of MSCs
Isolation of EVs
Quantification of EV Production
Early Endosome Labeling
Angiogenesis Antibody Array Assay
Bioplex Assay
Bovine Thrombin Residual Measurements
Western Blot Analysis
2.10. In Vitro Matrigel Tube Formation Assay
2.11. In Vitro Proliferation and Viability Assays
2.12. In Vitro Scratch-Wound-Closure Assays
2.13. Animal Model
2.16. Statistical Analyses
Effects of Preconditioning on EV Production and Characteristics
Effects of Preconditioning on Protein Cargo in Shedding EVs
Effects of Preconditioning on the Cutaneous Wound Healing of EVs
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.