Abstract
The treatment of choice in acute iliofemoral venous thrombosis is still controversial. This prospective randomized study compares the results of conventional anticoagulation of 32 patients with the results obtained in 31 patients undergoing acute thrombectomy combined with a temporary arteriovenous fistula and anticoagulation. Early complications were few in both treatment groups, and significant pulmonary embolism developed in only one conservatively treated patient. At 6-month follow-up in all surviving patients, leg swelling, varicose veins, and venous claudication were more frequent after conservative treatment. Only 7% (2 of 27) of these patients were completely free from postthrombotic symptoms compared with 42% (10 of 24) of the operated patients (p less than 0.005). Contrast phlebography demonstrated an excellent venous outflow through the iliofemoral segment in 35% (9 of 26) of the conservatively treated and in 76% (16 of 21) of the operated patients (p less than 0.025). Open femoropopliteal veins with competent valves were recorded in 26% (7 of 27) in the conservative group and in 52% (12 of 23) in the thrombectomy group (p less than 0.05). Thus thrombectomy combined with arteriovenous fistula decreases early symptoms and preserves venous outflow and valvular function better than conservative treatment. This procedure is therefore recommended for young patients with acute iliofemoral thrombosis to avoid development of incapacitating postthrombotic sequelae.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.