Thrombectomy versus combined thrombolysis and thrombectomy in patients with large vessel occlusion and chronic kidney disease

Abstract

BackgroundWhether intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) should be bridged before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) remains uncertain in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). MethodsThis research systematically enrolled every patient with both acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and CKD who received MT and fulfilled the criteria for IVT from January 2015 to December 2022. According to whether they underwent IVT, the patients were categorized into two cohorts: MT and combined IVT + MT. A binary logistic regression model was used to adjust for potential confounders, and propensity score matching analysis was used to assess the efficacy and safety of IVT in AIS patients with CKD who underwent MT. ResultsA total number of 406 patients were ultimately included in this study, with 236 patients in the MT group and 170 in the combined group. After PSM, there were 170 patients in the MT group and 170 in the combined group, and the clinical characteristics between the two groups were well balanced. The MT + IVT group had better long-term functional outcomes than the MT group (35.9% versus 21.2%, P = 0.003) and more modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) (2b-3) (94.1% versus 87.6%, P = 0.038), while no significant difference was found regarding symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). In line with the results observed in the in the postmatched population, the logistic regression revealed that patients in the IVT + MT group demonstrated superior clinical outcomes (adjusted OR 0.440 [95% CI (0.267–0.726)], P = 0.001) in the prematched population. ConclusionFor LVO patients with CKD and indications for IVT, IVT bridging MT improves their prognosis compared with direct MT.