Abstract

SummaryIn the conceptualization of thriving at work, it is emphasized that employees' learning and vitality are two equally important components of thriving and that thriving is facilitated by contextual features and available resources. In this study, we examined the effects of two challenge stressors (time pressure and learning demands) on thriving at work. Based on the literature on challenge and hindrance stressors, we proposed that challenge stressors positively affect learning and negatively affect vitality. To uncover underlying mechanisms, we measured challenge appraisal and hindrance appraisal of work situations in a diary study. A sample of 124 knowledge workers responded to three daily surveys (before the lunch break, during the afternoon, and at the end of the workday) for a period of five workdays. Results indicate that the indirect effects of learning demands and time pressure on learning are mediated by challenge appraisal, whereas indirect effects of learning demands on vitality are mediated by hindrance appraisal. Overall, our study shows that challenge stressors have a positive total effect on learning but no total effect on vitality. These differential relationships call for a finer distinction between the two components of thriving at work in future research. Copyright © 2016 The Authors Journal of Organizational Behavior Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Highlights

  • We live in a fast-paced world characterized by turbulent economic changes (e.g., Cascio, 1995; Rosa, 2003, 2013)

  • As our study focused on within-person effects of time pressure and learning demands, we decided to recruit knowledge workers to participate in a diary study (Fisher & To, 2012; Ohly, Sonnentag, Niessen, & Zapf, 2010)

  • The results showed that the effects of both challenge stressors via cognitive appraisal on thriving at work could not be explained by positive meaning, ruling out potential alternative explanations of our results

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We live in a fast-paced world characterized by turbulent economic changes (e.g., Cascio, 1995; Rosa, 2003, 2013). Companies have to adapt quickly to changing environments to stay competitive. In order to be sustainable, it is becoming increasingly important for companies to maintain a thriving workforce energized to grow and develop (Spreitzer, Porath, & Gibson, 2012). Thriving at work can be described as a “psychological state in which individuals experience both a sense of vitality and a sense of learning at work” Thriving employees supposedly create new resources, such as knowledge, meaning, and strong social relationships, while performing their work. Thriving at work contributes to performance while improving employees’ health at the same time (e.g., Porath, Spreitzer, Gibson, & Garnett, 2012)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call