Thriving in three Northwestern Ontario communities

Abstract

Disease-based models of health often fail to consider socio-economic models that perpetuate optimal health. The promotion of human thriving, rather than merely surviving, can be achieved by promoting optimal health indicators that facilitate overall wellbeing. Such interventions are those that promote a high quality of life, otherwise conceptualized as a “life worth living,” and can consist of life activities that exist outside of traditional health care intervention. Despite the continuous rise of health outcomes in Canada, it is likely that the cost associated with thriving may reduce the likelihood that optimal health will be achieved by many. Previous studies have generated the cost of thriving calculated for a single individual living in the Greater Toronto Area and have found that the cost of thriving is below the median annual income for this region. In the current study, this framework has been applied to three additional communities in Northwestern Ontario. Results indicated that when costs of thriving in Thunder Bay, Sioux Lookout, and a small remote community were compared, costs of thriving were highest in more rural and remote areas. Given the limited availability of regional data, it was not possible to generate specific total costs for all communities in this review. Overall, health promotion and wellbeing approaches can be diversified by using evidence-based, strength-based health interventions. Such approaches can be offered in conjunction with traditional public health initiatives, to better foster individual-level health (through disease reduction) and wellbeing (such as promoting hope, belonging, meaning, and purpose) within community.