Three-way conflict analysis and resolution based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy information

Abstract

In solving some complex conflict problems, compared with intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs) and Pythagorean fuzzy sets (PFSs), q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets (q-ROFSs) can better express and model imprecise information. In addition, three-way decisions (TWDs), an emerging theory of simulating human decision-making behavior, play an increasingly important role in the study of conflict problems. In order to solve conflict problems under q-rung orthopair fuzzy information (q-ROFI), we propose a three-way conflict analysis and resolution model based on TWDs and decision-theoretic rough sets (DTRSs) theory, which provides another answer for Deja's fundamental questions about Pawlak's conflict model, namely, “what are the inherent causes of conflict?” and “how can a viable strategy be found?” different from the existing ones. To be specific, firstly, we define new conflict distances and conflict function for q-ROFI system using aggregation functions and weight determination method, and prove some of their properties. On this basis, the concepts of three-level of contention set and agent set, a trisection of conflict set under individual contention and contention set, and maximum doughty coalition of q-ROFI are introduced. Secondly, after introducing the rough approximation threshold calculation method on the basis of standard evaluation set, to find the optimal viable strategy under the given q-ROFI, we calculate and sort the score function by the upper and lower approximation operators in the proposed q-rung orthopair fuzzy decision-theoretic rough sets (q-ROFDTRSs) model. Thirdly, we use the proposed model to study a land-use conflict case in a metropolitan area to verify the feasibility. Finally, from sensitivity and comparative analysis, we verify the stability and validity of the q-ROFDTRSs model.