Abstract
In acoustic intensity estimation, adding a microphone at the probe center removes errors associated with pressure averaging. Analytical bias errors are presented for a one-dimensional, three-microphone probe for active intensity, reactive intensity, and specific acoustic impedance in a monopole field. Traditional estimation is compared with the Phase and Amplitude Gradient Estimator (PAGE) method; the PAGE method shows an increased bandwidth for all three quantities. The two- and three-microphone methods are compared experimentally, showing reduced bias errors with three-microphone PAGE for active and reactive intensity, whereas using two microphones is preferred for specific acoustic impedance.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
