Abstract

Simple SummaryRecent advances in fusion imaging technology have made it easier to visualize and estimate ablative margins. This study was conducted to assess the clinical feasibility of a computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fusion application for evaluation of the ablative margin in radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Seventeen patients developed local tumor progressions (LTPs) due to wrong initial evaluations of technical success through a side-by-side comparison, and we reevaluated the ablative margins using the CT/MRI overlay fusion application. Eight patients were categorized into grade C (margin-zero ablation) and nine patients into grade D (existence of residual HCC). LTP occurred in re-graded C patients within 4 to 30.3 months (median, 14.3 months), and in re-graded D patients within 2.4 to 6.7 months (median, 4.2 months) (p = 0.006). Overlay fused CT/MRI imaging can allow us to evaluate HCC ablative margin three-dimensionally with high accuracy. Background: We investigate the feasibility of image fusion application for ablative margin assessment in radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and possible causes for a wrong initial evaluation of technical success through a side-by-side comparison. Methods: A total of 467 patients with 1100 HCCs who underwent RFA were reviewed retrospectively. Seventeen patients developed local tumor progressions (LTPs) (median size, 1.0 cm) despite initial judgments of successful ablation referring to contrast-enhanced images obtained in the 24 h after ablation. The ablative margins were reevaluated radiologically by overlaying fused images pre- and post-ablation. Results: The initial categorizations of the 17 LTPs had been grade A (absolutely curative) (n = 5) and grade B (relatively curative) (n = 12); however, the reevaluation altered the response categories to eight grade C (margin-zero ablation) and nine grade D (existence of residual HCC). LTP occurred in eight patients re-graded as C within 4 to 30.3 months (median, 14.3) and in nine patients re-graded as D within 2.4 to 6.7 months (median, 4.2) (p = 0.006). Periablational hyperemia enhancements concealed all nine HCCs reevaluated as grade D. Conclusion: Side-by-side comparisons carry a risk of misleading diagnoses for LTP of HCC. Overlay fused imaging technology can be used to evaluate HCC ablative margin with high accuracy.

Highlights

  • Imaging-guided ablative therapies have become fundamental in the treatment of Imaging-guided ablative become fundamental in surgery the treatment hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC),therapies and have have proven to be competitive with in termsof hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and have proven to be competitive with surgery in local terms of overall survival in cases of single nodules less than 2 cm [1,2,3,4]

  • Despite grade A or B judgments of their early responses referring to contrastenhanced images obtained in the 24 h after ablation, local tumor progressions (LTPs) occurred in 17 patients until

  • We reevaluated the ablative margins with a computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fusion imaging application, and 17 patients were categorized into grade C and grade D

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Imaging-guided ablative therapies have become fundamental in the treatment of Imaging-guided ablative become fundamental in surgery the treatment hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC),therapies and have have proven to be competitive with in termsof hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and have proven to be competitive with surgery in local terms of overall survival in cases of single nodules less than 2 cm [1,2,3,4]. HCC patients treated with percutaneous ablation recurrences have been demonstrated in HCC patients treated with percutaneous ablation therapy [5,6,7,8,9], reaching higher than 40% during 2–3 years of follow-up [10,11]. It is well therapythat [5,6,7,8,9], higherprogression than 40% during of follow-up. The ablative margins were reevaluated radiologically by overlaying fused images pre- and post-ablation

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call