Abstract

BackgroundThere is a paucity of data concerning the morphological differences of resected distal femurs and proximal tibias in osteoarthritic (OA) and normal knees. The objective of this study was to determine whether morphometric differences in the surfaces of resected distal femurs and proximal tibias exist between OA and normal knees in a Chinese population.MethodsNinety-four OA knees and ninety-five normal knees were evaluated in Chinese individuals. Computed tomography was used to measure the femoral mediolateral (fML), medial anteroposterior (fMAP), lateral anteroposterior (fLAP), medial condylar width (fMCW), lateral condylar width (fLCW), medial posterior condylar curvature radii (fMCR), lateral posterior condyle curvature radii (fLCR), fML/fMAP aspect ratio, tibial mediolateral (tML), middle anteroposterior (tAP), medial anteroposterior (tMAP), and lateral anteroposterior (tLAP) tML/tMAP aspect ratio to determine the morphologic differences between OA and normal knees.ResultsThe average fMCW and tMAP dimensions of OA knees were larger than those of normal knees in both male and female (p <0.05). The fMAP/fML aspect ratio and tMAP/tML aspect ratio were also significantly different in both sexs (p <0.05). OA knees have an oval-shaped distal femur with a wider ML length and more spherical-shaped proximal tibiae with relatively narrow ML dimensions.ConclusionsThe study revealed the morphological differences in fMCW, tMAP, fMAP/fML and tMAP/tML between OA and normal knees in both males and females. These findings may provide guidelines that can be used to design better knee implants that are more size-matched for OA knees.

Highlights

  • There is a paucity of data concerning the morphological differences of resected distal femurs and proximal tibias in osteoarthritic (OA) and normal knees

  • An appropriate prosthesis size that matches the resected bony surfaces is considered a crucial factor for success in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) [1, 2]

  • OA subjects were older, lower and had larger Hip knee ankle (HKA) angles than normal knee subjects

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is a paucity of data concerning the morphological differences of resected distal femurs and proximal tibias in osteoarthritic (OA) and normal knees. Dong et al BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (2021) 22:1013 data [7, 8], while others have analyzed anthropometric features of diseased knees during TKA [9, 10] It is unclear whether there are morphometric differences in the resected bony surfaces between diseased and normal knees. Most knees that undergo TKA are deformed and shaped differently than healthy knees This suggests that the design of the prosthesis should be based on data from diseased knees [11]. The aim of this study, was to measure the morphometric features of the resected distal femur and proximal tibia surface to determine whether there are morphometric differences between OA and normal knees

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call