Abstract

BackgroundThe aim of this study is to evaluate upper airway changes three-dimensionally following rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and compare the changes with matched controls.Materials and methodsSeventeen patients (mean age 12.6 ± 1.8 years) with maxillary transverse deficiency were treated with RME. Using the propensity score matching method, 17 patients (mean age 12.3 ± 1.5 years) were selected from a non-RME control group of 33. Case-control matching was performed based on 5 covariates: age, gender, CBCT scan interval, sagittal skeletal pattern, and tongue posture. Airway volumes of nasopharynx and oropharynx and minimum cross-sectional areas (MCA) of oropharynx were measured and compared between the case and control groups in CBCT scan images.ResultsIn the case group, significant increases from before to after RME were found in all measurements except MCA of the retroglossal segment of oropharynx. Before treatment, there were no significant differences between case group and control group. While comparing the case group with the control group after treatment showed overall greater increases in the case group. In particular, MCA of retropalatal segment showed statistically significant differences.ConclusionThe results of this study indicate that RME causes an increase in upper airway dimensions.

Highlights

  • Rapid maxillary expansion (RME) is a common technique used to correct maxillary transverse deficiencies and posterior crossbites in young patients

  • Significant increases from before to after RME were found in all measurements except minimum cross-sectional areas (MCA) of the retroglossal segment of oropharynx

  • There were no significant differences between case group and control group

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rapid maxillary expansion (RME) is a common technique used to correct maxillary transverse deficiencies and posterior crossbites in young patients. Functional evaluation of upper airway showed that treatment with RME significantly improves breathing functions [5]. Upper airway dimensions following RME treatment have been evaluated using conebeam computed tomography (CBCT); only a few studies have compared their case group with a control group [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. The studies that have compared their case group with a control group showed inconsistent results [11,12,13]. The aim of this study is to evaluate upper airway changes three-dimensionally following rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and compare the changes with matched controls

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call