Three-year field experiment on the risk reduction, environmental merit, and cost assessment of four in situ remediation technologies for metal(loid)-contaminated agricultural soil

Abstract

The traditional assessment of agricultural soil remediation technologies pay limited attention to sustainability and only considers the decrease in contaminant concentrations and cost, even though the sustainability of these technologies has been prioritized. This 3-year field study comprehensively assessed the sustainability of four commonly used agricultural soil remediation technologies in terms of metal(loid) removal efficiency, environmental merit, and cost. The farmland was contaminated by previous sewage irrigation with excessive amounts of As, Cd, and Pb. The four selected remediation technologies used were phytoextraction, intercropping of hyperaccumulators and cash crops, chemical immobilization, and turnover and attenuation (T&A). A risk reduction–environmental merit–cost model was utilized to compare these four technologies. Results showed that T&A reduced the health risks posed by excess metal(loid)s by ∼47% and yielded the highest risk reduction and lowest cost. Phytoextraction achieved the highest environmental merit because it produced the least interruption to the environment. A simplified assessment frame for soil remediation technology was established from a retrospective aspect using data from a real soil remediation project. Environmental merit is a less considered factor and more difficult to quantify than risk reduction or cost, thus requiring increased attention.