Abstract

Abstract. This study uses ship-based weather radar observations collected from research vessel Investigator to evaluate the Australian weather radar network calibration monitoring technique that uses spaceborne radar observations from the NASA Global Precipitation Mission (GPM). Quantitative operational applications such as rainfall and hail nowcasting require a calibration accuracy of ±1 dB for radars of the Australian network covering capital cities. Seven ground-based radars along the western coast of Australia and the ship-based OceanPOL radar are first calibrated independently using GPM radar overpasses over a 3-month period. The calibration difference between the OceanPOL radar (used as a moving reference for the second step of the study) and each of the seven operational radars is then estimated using collocated, gridded, radar observations to quantify the accuracy of the GPM technique. For all seven radars the calibration difference with the ship radar lies within ±0.5 dB, therefore fulfilling the 1 dB requirement. This result validates the concept of using the GPM spaceborne radar observations to calibrate national weather radar networks (provided that the spaceborne radar maintains a high calibration accuracy). The analysis of the day-to-day and hourly variability of calibration differences between the OceanPOL and Darwin (Berrimah) radars also demonstrates that quantitative comparisons of gridded radar observations can accurately track daily and hourly calibration differences between pairs of operational radars with overlapping coverage (daily and hourly standard deviations of ∼ 0.3 and ∼ 1 dB, respectively).

Highlights

  • Operational radar networks play a major role in providing situational awareness and nowcasting in severe weather situations, including heavy rain, flash floods, hailstorms, and wind gusts

  • We are fortunate enough that over 2 months including the YMCA and Optimizing Radar Calibration and Attenuation corrections (ORCA) observational periods, the rainfall activity allowed us to collect a reasonable number of Global Precipitation Mission (GPM) overpasses over each radar

  • Considering the expected typical error of 2 dB for individual GPM overpasses as a guideline, it seems reasonable to assume that the calibration of the OceanPOL, Warruwi (77), Dampier (15), Broome (17), and Serpentine (70) radars has not changed over the observational period either, with fluctuations around the mean calibration error estimate of less than ∼ 1.5 dB

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Operational radar networks play a major role in providing situational awareness and nowcasting in severe weather situations, including heavy rain, flash floods, hailstorms, and wind gusts. Despite multiple possible sources of errors contributing to the VMM calibration error estimate, such as temporal mismatch, imperfect attenuation corrections, gridding and range effects, and differences in radar minimum detectable signal, the overall accuracy of such technique is thought to be better than 2 dB for individual overpasses (Schwaller and Morris, 2011; W18; L19). It must be noted, that there has been no independent quantification of this accuracy.

Radar observations during YMCA and ORCA and calibration comparisons
The YMCA and ORCA experiments
The radars of this study
The S3CAR radar calibration framework
Statistical comparisons between OceanPOL and the ground radars
Results
The accuracy of the GPM VMM technique
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call