Abstract

Contemporary political regimes in Venezuela and Bolivia led by late Hugo Châvez (now by his successor Nicolas Maduro) and Evo Morales are considered by foreign and Russian scholars as part of the third wave of populism. In the 20th century Latin America already witnessed two waves of populism which coincided with significant political transitions, namely a transition from oligarchy to mass politics accompanied by implementation of import substitution industrialization policies, and a transition from authoritarian rule to democracy during the third wave of democratization which triggered neoliberal reforms inspired by Washington Consensus. This article presents common characteristics of Latin American populist regimes that emerged in different historical periods which help identify the origins as well as distinctive features of Venezuelan and Bolivian political regimes. It is stated that the Châvez and Morales left populist regimes resemble classic populist regimes in that they rely on incendiary anti-establishment discourse. Therefore, left populist regimes are characterized by high levels of polarization as well as weak institutionalization and class or indigenous orientation. Election of left populist leaders may lead to institutional deadlock, uneven playing field and transition to competitive authoritarianism.

Highlights

  • Election of left populist leaders may lead to institutional deadlock, uneven playing field and transition to competitive authoritarianism

  • Contemporary political regimes in Venezuela and Bolivia led by late Hugo Chávez and Evo Morales are considered by foreign and Russian scholars as part of the third wave of populism

  • In the 20th century Latin America already witnessed two waves of populism which coincided with significant political transitions, namely a transition from oligarchy to mass politics accompanied by implementation of import substitution industrialization policies, and a transition from authoritarian rule to democracy during the third wave of democratization which triggered neoliberal reforms inspired by Washington Consensus

Read more

Summary

ТРИ ВОЛНЫ ПОПУЛИЗМА В ЛАТИНСКОЙ АМЕРИКЕ

Московский государственный институт международных отношений (университет) МИД России. В что популистские режимы второй волны в силу зависимости от реакции населения на издержпроводимой ими ортодоксальной экономиче- ки неолиберальных реформ, связанные прежде ской политики не могли быть режимами левой всего со сворачиванием программ социальной ориентации. Что они ной системы, кризис госуправления, резкий ска- возникли в период политического и экономичечок цен на нефтепродукты в 2003 г.), изначально ского кризиса, когда основные институты власти были освобождены от влияния ряда внутренних потеряли легитимность, и консолидировались и внешних ограничивающих факторов Если в Венесуэле ной партийной системы, завершённых неоли- массовая мобилизация носила строго вертиберальных реформ и диверсифицированной кальный характер

Современные левопопулистские режимы в
Список литературы
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.