Abstract
We wanted to determine whether the microscopic evaluation of urinary sediment could be replaced by either a biochemical determination (Chemstrip-9) or a colorimetric staining procedure (Bac-T-Screen), and to evaluate the feasibility of omitting from urinalyses attempts to culture urines. Cultures were considered positive when colony counts were greater than or equal to 10(3) for catheterized patients and greater than or equal to 10(4) for noncatheterized patients. The results of three separate studies on symptomatic patients showed a progressive decline in the sensitivity of the Chemstrip-9, which is a test for leukocyte esterase activity, and a difference in the sensitivity of the Bac-T-Screen between two of the studies. Neither test was consistently more sensitive or more predictive of a positive culture than was urine microscopy. By the end of the third study, we were convinced that the three methods are comparably sensitive and specific. Because 13 to 36% of positive cultures would be missed by these techniques, urine from symptomatic patients should routinely be cultured.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
