Abstract
The current investigation assesses the construct validity of the Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement (K-TEA) via correlations with widely used group administered tests of academic achievement. Three separate samples were administered the Comprehensive Form of the K-TEA and a group administered achievement test; the Comprehensive Test of Basic Skills, Stanford Achievement Tests, or Metropolitan Achievement Tests. Mean scores on the measures were quite similar. Correlations of the K-TEA with the group measures were quite high, supporting its potential utility as an achievement screener. Needed additional validation studies and practical assessment issues are discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
