Abstract
This essay explores how early modern ideas of law and custom, focusing intensely on the Bible, became increasingly aware of the shifting meaning of biblical law codes over Old and New Testament time and the meanings encoded in biblical actions. It traces the emergence of the idea over the course of the early modern era that right interpretation of the Bible demanded a significant historical sensibility. This exegetical imperative took on particular significance in the middle decades of the seventeenth century, in response to a proliferation of non‐learned interpretation. Distinguishing this from later forms of historical criticism, the essay traces how the scriptures became in turn, a site for a cultural historicism that endowed the early modern Bible with a generative ability to produce copious commentary on the most insignificant curiosa, from the legal basis of biblical conduct to the cultural meanings of plants and natural history in the Bible. Looking primarily at Thomas Browne's Pseudodoxia Epidemica (1646) and its extensive engagement with biblical curiosa, the essay contextualizes Browne's scriptural exegesis within the work of contemporary legal‐scriptural theorists including John Selden, Thomas Fuller and Henry Hammond.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.