Abstract

Relational value (RV) has recently been introduced as a third class of values for understanding values of nature and are thought to sit alongside more familiar axiological categories such as instrumental and intrinsic value. The concept has quickly gained ground in and promises to better capture how people and collectives perceive of their wellbeing and make choices that involve the natural world. While the idea of relational value is not without merits, its initial and current conceptualization raises questions about how it relates to existing value concepts. Here, we start from an interdisciplinary perspective and delineate how the concept can contribute to addressing problems in three fields that deal with environmental values in different ways: environmental ethics; ecosystem services valuation; and environmental psychology. We provide an overview of value concepts in each field and show how relational value has been described or applied. Our analysis shows that value concepts are used to solve different problems in the three fields, and these differences have implications for how relational value can be framed and situated in values theory. These differences involve e.g., the descriptive question of how people value nature versus the normative questions of why nature should be valued. We show how the concept can be seen as solving the problem of narrow conceptualizations of intrinsic and instrumental value in ecosystem services valuation and suggest that RV can be conceived of as an epistemological framing rather than a values concept. The concept also has potential to function as a ‘boundary object’ to provide cross-fertilization of disciplinary perspectives.

Highlights

  • A wave of “relationality” has recently swept the scholarly discussions on ecosystem services (ES) (e.g., Chan et al 2016; Arias-Arévalo et al 2017, 2018; Díaz et al 2015)

  • In a recent special issue devoted to Relational value (RV) (Pascual et al 2018), Chan et al (2018) explained the development of the concept as a strategic aspiration of bridging ideas across fields to affect the discourse on values in science-policy organizations, as well as relying on a tactical opportunity tied to the word ‘values’ in the International Panel on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) conceptual framework

  • We have investigated how the notion of RV fits within three fields through outlining their respective value taxonomies and conceptualizations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A wave of “relationality” has recently swept the scholarly discussions on ecosystem services (ES) (e.g., Chan et al 2016; Arias-Arévalo et al 2017, 2018; Díaz et al 2015). 1462) for understanding values of nature, relational values (RVs) are intended to sit alongside the axiological. People and Nature under the slogan “a journal of relational thinking”. In a recent special issue devoted to RV (Pascual et al 2018), Chan et al (2018) explained the development of the concept as a strategic aspiration of bridging ideas across fields to affect the discourse on values in science-policy organizations, as well as relying on a tactical opportunity tied to the word ‘values’ in the IPBES conceptual framework. The development of the concept has multiple aims and is considered to address multiple interdisciplinary problems related to sustainability, but it is unclear to what extent the framing as a values concept is appropriate to contribute to these goals

Objectives
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call