Abstract
ABSTRACT In their paper, ‘Republican Freedom, Domination, and Ignorability,’ Jafarov and Huseynli argue that our analysis of republican freedom in terms of an ignorability test fails to distinguish republicanism from liberalism. In this reply, we defend our view, showing that their argument rests on three common errors about republicanism: first, that republicanism must distinguish itself from liberalism to succeed; second, that republicans cannot admit probabilistic reasoning; and third, that republican liberty and pure negative liberty generate equivalent judgments about freedom.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
