Abstract

AimsThis study aimed to evaluate the short-term oropharyngeal airway volumetric changes in growing Class III maxillary-deficient patients treated by facemask without expansion compared with untreated Class III controls, using low-dose computed tomography.MethodsEighteen maxillary-deficient children (9 boys, nine girls) with a mean age of 7.81 ± 0.84 years were treated with maxillary bonded bite block and facemask (FM). Pre- (T1) and post-treatment (T2) low-dose CT images were acquired. Sixteen untreated Class III patients with a mean age of 7.03 ± 0.56 years had previously two low-dose CT scans within a one year of follow-up. Volumetric and minimal cross-sectional area measurements were obtained to assess the oropharyngeal airway changes. Quantitative mean, minimum, and maximum displacement of superimposed 3D models were estimated from a point-based analysis. Paired-samples t-tests were used for the intragroup comparisons, and an independent samples t-test and the Mann–Whitney U tests were carried out for the intergroup comparisons.ResultsA statistically significant increase in the total and retropalatal volumes oropharyngeal airway volume were observed in the control group (302.23 ± 345.58 and 145.73 ± 189.22 mm3, respectively). In the FM group, statistically significant increases in the total and retropalatal volumes were observed (738.86 ± 1109.37 mm3 and 388.63 ± 491.44 mm3, respectively). However, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups, except for the maximum part analysis which was significantly greater in the FM group (p = 0.007).ConclusionsFM therapy appeared to have no additional effects on the oropharyngeal airway other than those induced by growth.

Highlights

  • The effects of the protraction facemask (FM) on upper airway have evaluated previously by many studies, the results remain controversial and unclear [1,2,3,4,5]

  • While Baccetti et al [1] demonstrated no Husson et al Progress in Orthodontics (2021) 22:50 significant changes in the sagittal upper airway dimensions, Hiyama et al [3] and Kaygısız et al [4] showed an increase in the superior upper airway space

  • Lee et al conducted a meta-analysis [5] and stressed the need for more 3D cohort studies research with untreated class III controls to determine the potential effects of FM on the upper airway

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The effects of the protraction facemask (FM) on upper airway have evaluated previously by many studies, the results remain controversial and unclear [1,2,3,4,5]. Volume, surfaces, and cross-sectional area extracted from 3D radiographic imaging by using commercial software offer the possibility to make a more precise evaluation of upper way [6, 7]. Over these measures, the superimposition of 3D model generated from 3D images and point-based analysis explain the changes in size and shape of structures involved in the treatment [15]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call