Abstract

Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is highly promising as a quantitative MRI technique due to its accuracy, robustness, and efficiency. Previous studies have found high repeatability and reproducibility of 2D MRF acquisitions in the brain. Here, we have extended our investigations to 3D MRF acquisitions covering the whole brain using spiral projection k-space trajectories.Our travelling head study acquired test/retest data from the brains of 12 healthy volunteers and 8 MRI systems (3 systems at 3 T and 5 at 1.5 T, all from a single vendor), using a study design not requiring all subjects to be scanned at all sites. The pulse sequence and reconstruction algorithm were the same for all acquisitions.After registration of the MRF-derived PD T1 and T2 maps to an anatomical atlas, coefficients of variation (CVs) were computed to assess test/retest repeatability and inter-site reproducibility in each voxel, while a General Linear Model (GLM) was used to determine the voxel-wise variability between all confounders, which included test/retest, subject, field strength and site.Our analysis demonstrated a high repeatability (CVs 0.7–1.3% for T1, 2.0–7.8% for T2, 1.4–2.5% for normalized PD) and reproducibility (CVs of 2.0–5.8% for T1, 7.4–10.2% for T2, 5.2–9.2% for normalized PD) in gray and white matter.Both repeatability and reproducibility improved when compared to similar experiments using 2D acquisitions. Three-dimensional MRF obtains highly repeatable and reproducible estimations of T1 and T2, supporting the translation of MRF-based fast quantitative imaging into clinical applications.

Highlights

  • Magnetic resonance imaging is one of the most powerful diagnostic techniques due to its versatility and its unparalleled soft tissue contrast

  • A T1 and T2 quantification is possible, clinical applications in vivo are limited by the long acquisition times and questions over repeatability and reproducibility (Deoni, 2010)

  • Representative co-registered Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) images from one subject are shown in Figure 3a, showing fully-quantitative maps with a high anatomical detail

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Magnetic resonance imaging is one of the most powerful diagnostic techniques due to its versatility and its unparalleled soft tissue contrast. The dominant contributors to the MR contrast are longitudinal (T1) and transverse (T2) relaxation times associated with the underlying nuclear magnetic resonance phenomenon. Variations in these parameters are observed with pathological changes in many diseases. Clinical evaluation is usually limited to a qualitative assessment of contrast, and rarely investigated with tissue relaxivity quantifications. A T1 and T2 quantification is possible, clinical applications in vivo are limited by the long acquisition times and questions over repeatability and reproducibility (Deoni, 2010)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call