Abstract
Predictive modeling codes for seafloor backscatter (e.g., finite difference methods) frequently take advantage of coordinate system symmetries in order to reduce the amount of numerical computation required to obtain a solution. Line sources in models with two-dimensional Cartesian coordinates (x,z) are often computationally fastest but assume symmetry into and out of the sagittal plane. Two-dimensional solutions in cylindrical coordinates (r,z) give the correct spreading and waveforms for point sources but range-dependent features in the sagittal plane represent ‘‘rings’’ about the vertical axis through the source and are somewhat unrealistic. In both of these 2-D cases, propagation and scattering are only considered for P-SV waves. In order to study the limitations of these 2-D approaches and to see if they are excluding any significant scattering mechanisms it is necessary to run some fully 3-D models. In addition to out-of-plane scattering of compressional body waves, vertically polarized shear body waves, and Stoneley (Scholte) waves, 3-D models include the new effects of SH body waves and Love (interface) waves. In this paper backscatter coefficients for single facets on a homogeneous seafloor, for a canonically rough (Goff–Jordan) seafloor, and for volume heterogeneities beneath a flat seafloor are compared. For soft bottoms such as sediment the backscatter coefficients of these models are within 3 dB. [Work supported by Office of Naval Research.]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.