Abstract

To assess the signal composition of cone photoreceptors three-dimensionally in healthy retinas using adaptive optics optical coherence tomography (AO-OCT). Study population. Twenty healthy eyes of ten subjects (age 23 to 67). Procedures. After routine ophthalmological assessments, eyes were examined using AO-OCT. Three-dimensional volumes were acquired at 2.5° and 6.5° foveal eccentricity in four main meridians (superior, nasal, inferior, temporal). Cone densities and signal compositions were investigated in four different planes: the cone inner segment outer segment junction (IS/OS), the cone outer segment combined with the IS/OS (ISOS+), the cone outer segment tips (COST) and full en-face plane (FEF) combining signals from all mentioned cone layers. Additionally, reliability of a simple semi-automated approach for assessment of cone density was tested. Main outcome measures. Cone density of IS/OS, IS/OS+, COST and FEF. Qualitative depiction and composition of each cone layer. Inter-rater agreement of cone density measurements. Mean overall cone density at all eccentricities was highest at the FEF plane (21.160/mm2), followed by COST (20.450/mm2), IS/OS+ (19.920/mm2) and IS/OS (19.530/mm2). The different meridians and eccentricities had a significant impact on cone density, with lower eccentricity resulting in higher cone densities (p≤.001), which were highest at the nasal, then temporal, then inferior and then superior meridian. Depiction of the cone mosaic differed between all 4 layers regarding signal size and packing density. Therefore, different cone layers showed evident but not complete signal overlap. Using the semi-automated technique for counting of cone signals achieved high inter-rater reliability (ICC > .99). In healthy individuals qualitative and quantitative changes in cone signals are found not only in different eccentricities and meridians, but also within different photoreceptor layers. The variation between cone planes has to be considered when assessing the integrity of cone photoreceptors in healthy and diseased eyes using adaptive optics technology.

Highlights

  • Visualization of the retina and especially the photoreceptor layers has been and still is a major goal of ophthalmic retinal imaging

  • Mean overall cone density at all eccentricities was highest at the full en-face plane (FEF) plane (21.160/mm2), followed by cone outer segment end tips (COST) (20.450/mm2), inner segment outer segment junction (IS/outer segment (OS))+ (19.920/mm2) and IS/OS (19.530/mm2)

  • The different meridians and eccentricities had a significant impact on cone density, with lower eccentricity resulting in higher cone densities (p .001), which were highest at the nasal, temporal, inferior and superior meridian

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Visualization of the retina and especially the photoreceptor layers has been and still is a major goal of ophthalmic retinal imaging. The most commonly used AO enhanced imaging technologies are AO flood illumination fundus camera (AO-FC) and AO scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (AO-SLO), which have both been applied on healthy eyes and in several retinal pathologies [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Both technologies allow for good visualization of the photoreceptor cone mosaic, they are limited to a two dimensional en-face view. This study applies AO-OCT on healthy individuals to provide a closer look on the three-dimensional appearance of cones with AO-enhanced OCT, answering the following questions: How is the quantitative relationship between photoreceptor signals in the different cone layers, and how do they compare to two-dimensional cone mosaic depiction of AO-FC/SLO in literature? And how well do different graders agree in counting of AO-OCT photoreceptor signals when using a simple, semi-automated approach of counting?

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.