Abstract
In this study, we describe the fabrication of an electrostatic beam position monitor (BPM) for beam diagnostic systems. Calibration of the BPM pickup requires both sensitivity and curve fitting owing to manufacturing tolerances following fabrication. To calibrate the BPM, we developed a BPM calibration system that comprises a wire-based test bench and readout electronics. We considered three difference-over-sum (DOS) data selection methods: DOSdiag, DOSaxis, and DOSall, to understand their impact on calibration accuracy. Each method selected specific DOS data, and we compared their characteristic curves. Consequently, we analyzed the calibration results by performing linear, 3rd-order, 5th-order, and two-dimensional (2D) 3rd-order polynomial fitting. Each of the three DOS data selection methods was examined to illustrate their advantages and limitations in terms of calibration accuracy and required amount of data. The results obtained demonstrated that choosing the appropriate DOS data-selection approach could be employed for the BPM offline calibrations, achieving minimized calibration errors and optimized response characteristics with polynomial curve fitting.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.