Abstract
In 1996, Justice Kennedy authored a bold — perhaps even revolutionary — opinion protecting the rights of minorities under the Equal Protection Clause. In 2014, Justice Kennedy authored yet another major equal protection decision, but this time refusing to protect minority interests — despite the undeniable factual and legal parallels between the two cases.To emphasize the factual parallels and yet divergent outcomes in these cases, this essay presents an imagined opinion that runs the facts of Romer through the reasoning of Scheutte. The end product is virtually seamless.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Paper version not known
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
