Abstract

While professional women artists responding to modernism's emphasis on individuality contributed to the 1890s decline of women's collective art culture, so did increased social class solidarity. Cincinnati's women museum advocates backed the goals of women's art culture embodied in Kensington-style institutions, including art training and decorative and fine arts parity. Women's art culture contained internal class tensions; women backed women's art labor both as a new artistic career path and as charity for the deserving poor. Cincinnati's women museum supporters exacerbated such class tensions when they targeted elite male donors by promoting art training to reform working-class men who lacked the unifying refinement that mitigated class tensions in women's art culture. Women thereby consolidated a cross-gender charitable elite patron class at the expense of women's art culture. Museum-trained women artists, furthermore, successfully advocated shifting to an institutional fine arts focus, addressing an elite patron class newly consolidated by women's museum advocacy.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.