Abstract
In this article, I provide commentary on the Rudd et al. (2009) article advocating thorough informed consent with suicidal clients. I examine the Rudd et al. recommendations in light of their previous empirical-research and clinical-practice articles on suicidality, and from the perspective of clinical practice with suicidal clients in university counseling center settings. I conclude that thorough informed consent is a clinical intervention that is still in preliminary stages of development, necessitating empirical research and clinical training before actual implementation as an ethical clinical intervention. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
