Abstract
Abstract This article offers sustained consideration for the first time of George Eliot’s entanglement with mid-nineteenth-century French art. Taking realism’s transnational nature as its point of origin, this essay probes Eliot’s claim in Adam Bede (1859) for seventeenth-century genre painting as the most conspicuous visual precedent to define, embody and vindicate her aesthetic choices – at just the moment when Gustave Courbet makes realism scandalous in the Salons of the Second Empire. Questioning Eliot’s deliberate disavowal of influence, I trace the modes of transmission through which Courbet’s art was exported to and circulated within Britain during the 1850s; while London’s official art world was unreceptive to French art in the nineteenth century, a different picture emerges if we consider the visibility afforded by independent galleries and the periodical press, and if we take account of these diverse reading, viewing and citational practices. I then offer close readings of works by Eliot and Courbet to suggest that both evidence a discomfort with representation as the primary methodology of realism, and consider the consequences for the ideological, epistemological and affective energies of realist aesthetics. Reading Eliot alongside Courbet reveals her radicalism, but this only becomes clear when we place her realism within the orbit of a broader European tradition and understand her aesthetics as a form of praxis.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.