Abstract
Abstract S3D and AR, emergence and augmentation, have certain similarities, for both call into question the surface of the image on the side of the viewer by introducing virtual elements into real space. A comparative analysis of the two strategies reveals that the mimetic program that largely structures the production and reception of technical images is not centred squarely on illusion, but more generally on immersion and more particularly on egocentric spatial immersion, which perceptually places the viewer at the centre of the virtual world. But at the present time, as they have developed so far, S3D and AR are imperfect responses to this ideal.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
