Abstract

Management of the woods is a labor of love negotiated between men in George Eliot’s Adam Bede (1859). However, as a resilient and vital entity through which men enact the volatile pains and pleasures of homosocial desire, contest and reconciliation, the woods are vulnerable to becoming the primary vehicle through which Eliot naturalizes a sustainable, masculinist capitalism. Indeed, the discourse of Victorian forestry and ‘improvement’ becomes common sense in the novel, fostering purportedly long-term, sustainable prosperity as a consolation prize in the wake of the plot’s central trauma of class betrayal. But, the very greening of this pact obscures the fact that the plan for the woods, like some of those of sustainability even today, may benefit some more than others, with distinct human and ecological winners and losers.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.