Abstract

Calls for censorship have been made in response to the proliferation of flat Earth videos on YouTube, but these videos are likely convincing to very few. Instead, people may worry these videos are brainwashing others. That individuals believe other people will be more influenced by media messages than themselves is called third-person perception (TPP), and the consequences from those perceptions, such as calls for censorship, are called third-person effects (TPE). Here, we conduct three studies that examine the flat Earth phenomenon using TPP and TPE as a theoretical framework. We first measured participants’ own perceptions of the convincingness of flat Earth arguments presented in YouTube videos and compared these to participants’ perceptions of how convincing others might find the arguments. Instead of merely looking at ratings of one’s self vs. a general ‘other,’ however, we asked people to consider a variety of identity groups who differ based on political party, religiosity, educational attainment, and area of residence (e.g., rural, urban). We found that participants’ religiosity and political party were the strongest predictors of TPP across the different identity groups. In our second and third pre-registered studies, we found support for our first study’s conclusions, and we found mixed evidence for whether TPP predict support for censoring YouTube among the public.

Highlights

  • Flat Earth ideology resurfaced from obscurity due to a proliferation of misinformation on YouTube (Landrum & Olshansky, 2019; Paolillo, 2018)

  • While most do not find the arguments made in flat Earth videos persuasive, at least at first exposure (Landrum, Olshansky, & Richards, 2019), a barrage of news articles highlight calls for YouTube to crack down on the spread of misinformation; and YouTube has responded by updating its recommendation algorithm (e.g., Binder, 2019; YouTube, 2019)

  • In addition to biblical literalists, participants expected people who did not go to college, people who live in rural areas, and Predicted TTP (Difference) Score

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Flat Earth ideology resurfaced from obscurity due to a proliferation of misinformation on YouTube (Landrum & Olshansky, 2019; Paolillo, 2018). Despite the videos’ presence on YouTube and the widespread media coverage the movement has received, a 2018 poll reports only 5% of the U.S public say they doubt the true shape of Earth, and only 2% are certain that Earth is flat (YouGov, 2018a). While most do not find the arguments made in flat Earth videos persuasive, at least at first exposure (Landrum, Olshansky, & Richards, 2019), a barrage of news articles highlight calls for YouTube to crack down on the spread of misinformation; and YouTube has responded by updating its recommendation algorithm (e.g., Binder, 2019; YouTube, 2019). Research finds that individuals often overestimate the effects media have on others

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.