Abstract
Abstract Background: Hysteroscopic septal resection has become the treatment of choice for women with septate or subseptate uteri because of this procedure's increased safety and efficacy. The indications/benefits for septal resection should be balanced against the risks. This article presents a case that illustrates the potential catastrophe that can result from an intervention performed on a patient with a “soft” indication for this procedure. Case: A second gravida female, whose previous pregnancy was complicated by preeclampsia and fetal death, had a history of hysteroscopic septal resection. At 34 weeks' gestation, she presented with abruptio placenta and subsequently had a uterine rupture after two doses of prostaglandin E2 gel. She was given a laparotomy to remove the deceased fetus and the ruptured tissues were repaired. Her uterus was conserved. Results: This patient recovered well and was discharged on the ninth postoperative day. She was advised to use contraception for at least 1 year and to m...
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
