Abstract

Thiopurines have been a cornerstone in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although they have been used for more than 50 years, there are still some unsolved issues about their efficacy and, also, some safety concerns, mainly the risk of myelosuppression and life-threatening lymphoproliferative disorders. Furthermore, the development of biological therapy raises the question whether there is still a role for thiopurines in the IBD treatment algorithm. On the other hand, limited cost and wide availability make thiopurines a reasonable option in settings of limited resources and increasing prevalence of IBD. In fact, there is a growing interest in optimizing thiopurine therapy, since pharmacogenomic findings suggest that a personalized approach based on the genotyping of some molecules involved in its metabolism could be useful to prevent side effects. Polymorphisms of thiopurine methyltransferase enzyme (TPMT) that result in low enzymatic activity have been associated with an increased risk of myelotoxicity, especially in Caucasians; however, in Asians it is assumed that the variants of nudix hydrolase 15 (NUDT15) are more relevant in the development of toxicity. Age is also important, since in elderly patients the risk of complications seems to be increased. Moreover, the primo-infection of Epstein Barr virus and cytomegalovirus under thiopurine treatment has been associated with severe lymphoproliferative disorders. In addition to assessing individual characteristics that may influence thiopurines treatment outcomes, this review also discusses other strategies to optimize the therapy. Low-dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol can be used in hypermethylators and in thiopurine-related hepatotoxicity. The measurement of metabolites could be useful to assess compliance, identify patients at risk of adverse events and also facilitating the management of refractory patients. Thioguanine is also a rescue therapy in patients with toxicity related to conventional thiopurine therapy. Finally, the current indications for thiopurines in monotherapy or in combination with biologics, as well as the optimal duration of treatment, are also reviewed.

Highlights

  • Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) includes mainly two chronic disorders affecting the gastrointestinal tract, Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), and it has a worldwide distribution [1]

  • There are Cochrane reviews of randomized controlled trials for both, CD and UC, demonstrating a superiority of AZA against placebo; the quality of evidence is again low, especially in UC [11, 12]. Another common indication is the prevention of postsurgical relapse, but despite the fact that it seems to be superior to placebo, there is a wide heterogeneity in the designs of studies and in one small randomized trial comparing AZA with biologics there were no differences in efficacy between both treatments while in other study adalimumab was superior [5, 13, 14]

  • The evidence supporting combination therapy of AZA with biologics relays mainly on two prospective trials in which combination therapy was superior to monotherapy in CD and UC [9, 15]

Read more

Summary

Frontiers in Medicine

Thiopurines have been a cornerstone in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). They have been used for more than 50 years, there are still some unsolved issues about their efficacy and, some safety concerns, mainly the risk of myelosuppression and life-threatening lymphoproliferative disorders. The development of biological therapy raises the question whether there is still a role for thiopurines in the IBD treatment algorithm. Polymorphisms of thiopurine methyltransferase enzyme (TPMT) that result in low enzymatic activity have been associated with an increased risk of myelotoxicity, especially in Caucasians; in Asians it is assumed that the variants of nudix hydrolase 15 (NUDT15) are more relevant in the development of toxicity.

INTRODUCTION
Depending on Individual Characteristics
Risk of myelotoxicity
Other Personal Risks
Using Low Dose Thiopurine and Allopurinol
Adjusting Dose of TP Depending on Metabolites
Using Thioguanine
Thiopurines as Monotherapy
Recommendation Continue therapy Change therapy Reduce dose
Maintenance After Combination Therapy
Findings
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call