Abstract
The article analyzes the role of emotion in discourse about lobotomy in the mid-twentieth century. It shows how the scientific justification for lobotomy relied on a general theory of psychopathology that identified emotion as the root impairment in mental illness, and also argues that a similar rhetoric surfaced in arguments against lobotomy's critics, who were dismissed as emotional and unreasonable when they voiced opposition to the operation. Although lobotomy is no longer a mainstream medical practice, the rhetoric of emotional impairment continues to impact on the lives of people with psychiatric disabilities, which the article suggests might be remedied by valuing emotion and validating emotional argument.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
