Abstract
ABSTRACT The essay explores a hermeneutic reading of nature that expands the Kantian theory of aesthetics beyond the need for beauty to support cognition’s subjective interest. As in Kant’s third Critique, reason’s subjective interest, which refers to how the manifold can be held together by the unity of transcendental apperception, grounds nature's purposiveness in moral intelligence. By improvising on Kant’s aesthetics, as Schelling did in German Idealism, we can imagine the subject of critical reason embracing a modal possibility of existence that deals with nature's part-whole essence or nature’s original duplicity. The modality creates a subject capable of choosing and justifying a world of its own, but not without the destructive condition that precedes this act, the world's intuitive collapse. Given the contemporary engagements with Kant’s aesthetics, from Simondon, Badiou, Stiegler, Hui, Karatani, and other critical commentators (of Kant), the essay addresses how this modal possibility of existence connects aesthetics to the ethical task of destroying the known world. But to the extent that the world is exhibiting signs of collapse, as we enter a new geological era, the aesthetic sense of locating ‘where nature in this collapse is’ becomes an essential path of thinking and living with ruins.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.