Abstract

Literature pertaining to ethnic entrepreneurship assumes that religious-cultural and generational factors espouse the intention and ability of the entrepreneur towards business development. And by way of business growth and development, such entrepreneurs should breakout from their local ethnic customer base to service a wider non-ethnic customer base. In reality, many ethnic entrepreneurs lack the resources, the motivation, the ability and/or intention to do this. Consequently, the development and success of the business become hampered. To this end, working within a context of ethnic entrepreneurship, the aim of this paper is to examine the notion that entrepreneurial intention, ability and opportunity inform business growth, development and how the entrepreneur defines the success thereof. Addressing this, 48 semi-structured interviews and 11 comparative case studies were conducted with first- and second generation South Asian Sikh, Hindu and Pakistani Muslim entrepreneurs within Greater London. A phenomenological paradigm was adopted, with key-words-in-context used to analyze data. Findings note there is no evidence of genuine breakout. Instead, what defines business development and growth is three approaches: (i) content to remain, (ii) forced to remain, and (iii) struggling to adjust. Hindered are attempts to increase the customer and market base beyond that of local clients. Additionally, differences and success between the two generations are reflective of sectorial location, intention, ability and skill-sets, rather than generational or cultural influences. Essentially, the paper presents an alternative view of how entrepreneurial intention, ability and opportunity facilitate or inhibit small business growth and success. However, given the sample-frame and, socio-economic environment within Greater London, findings may not be generalizable. In conclusion, debate pertaining to ethnic entrepreneurship needs to be re-examined; because placing emphasis on culture, religion, ethnicity and generation may be misleading researchers as to the true nature of business requirements, problems and support for ethnic entrepreneurs.

Highlights

  • The term ‘think non-ethnic, but act ethnic’ was coined by a London-based Sikh second-generation entrepreneur

  • With the above firmly in mind, working from a generational South Asian perspective and within the respondents own frame of reference, the aim of this paper is to examine the notion that entrepreneurial intention, ability and opportunity inform business growth, development and how the entrepreneur defines the success thereof

  • The aim of this paper was to examine the notion that entrepreneurial intention, ability and opportunity inform business growth, development and how the entrepreneur defines the success thereof

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The term ‘think non-ethnic, but act ethnic’ was coined by a London-based Sikh second-generation entrepreneur. The entrepreneur was illustrating the point that many ethnic businesses like to think they are operating to mainstream UK businesses. Literature notes that the objectives of the firm tend to be synonymous with those of the owner, and entrepreneurial characteristics and behavior are displayed in the managerial practices employed in running the business. This applies to family-owned small businesses (Glancey, Greig, & Pettigrew, 1998; Korunka, Frank, Lueger, & Mugler, 2003). As expected informants operated within low order catering and retailing, and all employed immediate and extended family members This employment situation was consistent with existing ethnic family business literature.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call