Abstract
ABSTRACT This article presents the results of five open-ended surveys administered to two Advanced Placement classes in a primarily White high school in upstate New York. Surveys sought to explore how students make sense of the course diversity selection, Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart, which was inserted into a primarily White textual canon. Responses were coded and analysed via a Critical Discourse Analysis methodology. Analysis revealed that while many students replicated the discursive patterns of White innocence, characterised by an obliviousness to their complicity in White supremacy, some students, often coming from marginalised social positions, registered more nuanced reactions to the power dynamics represented in the text. The study concludes that while diversity insertions like Things Fall Apart can be mechanisms that actually reinforce White supremacy due to a perceived social disconnect, modest insights can also be generated by students seeking to better understand the dynamics of contemporary social oppression.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
