Abstract

Recent advances in satellite imaging technology have greatly improved our observations of planetary surfaces. The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) Narrow Angle Camera (NAC) records images with resolutions on average of 0.5 m per pixel, resolving meter scale features on the surface of the Moon. NAC images have revealed layered deposits, interpreted to be sequences of mare basalt flows, in the walls of impact craters on the lunar nearside. However, caution must be exercised in the interpretation of surface processes from morphologies of features that are close to the limits of detectability. Our goal is to quantify where that limit is for lava flow stratigraphy.Here we report on a terrestrial analog study conduced to better constrain limitations in the measurements of thicknesses of lava flows observed in high-resolution satellite-collected images. Using WorldView-2 satellite images, we mapped layered basalt flows at three sites in the Wai'anae and Ko'olau Ranges of O'ahu, Hawai'i. Fieldwork conducted at these sites allowed for assessment of the accuracy of image interpretations. We found that flow thickness estimates made using WorldView-2 images overestimated thicknesses of individual lava flows measured in the field at all eight locations visited by a factor of 1.2 to 3.5. A primary reason for this overestimation by remote sensing analysis is that many outcropping “layers” within a transect contain more than one individual flow, a distinction that is not visible in satellite images. However, the mean thickness of the layers seen in the orbital data was 0.8 to 1.7 times the outcrop thickness measured in the field, suggesting that the remote measurements should be considered estimates of the outcrop thickness rather than the thickness of individual lava flows.Measurements of layered lunar mare lava units in LRO NAC images provided layer thicknesses that ranged from <1–6 times greater than those derived from images of the O'ahu study sites. It is reasonable to expect that many lunar outcrops similarly contain more than one individual flow and display similar outcropping patterns. This suggests that many current estimates of layer thicknesses derived by comparable methods actually correspond to outcrop thicknesses. Current interpretations of lava flow thicknesses derived from planetary images should be considered maximums for individual flow thicknesses with uncertainties that may be as high as a factor of 3 or more.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.