Abstract

The specification and prediction of density fluctuations in the thermosphere, especially during geomagnetic storms, is a key challenge for space weather observations and modeling. It is of great operational importance for tracking objects orbiting in near-Earth space. For low-Earth orbit, variations in neutral density represent the most important uncertainty for propagation and prediction of satellite orbits. An international conference in 2018 conducted under the auspices of the NASA Community Coordinated Modeling Center (CCMC) included a workshop on neutral density modeling, using both empirical and numerical methods, and resulted in the organization of an initial effort of model comparison and evaluation. Here, we present an updated metric for model assessment under geomagnetic storm conditions by dividing a storm in four phases with respect to the time of minimum Dst and then calculating the mean density ratios and standard deviations and correlations. Comparisons between three empirical (NRLMSISE-00, JB2008 and DTM2013) and two first-principles models (TIE-GCM and CTIPe) and neutral density data sets that include measurements by the CHAMP, GRACE, and GOCE satellites for 13 storms are presented. The models all show reduced performance during storms, notably much increased standard deviations, but DTM2013, JB2008 and CTIPe did not on average reveal a significant bias in the four phases of our metric. DTM2013 and TIE-GCM driven with the Weimer model achieved the best results taking the entire storm event into account, while NRLMSISE-00 systematically and significantly underestimates the storm densities. Numerical models are still catching up to empirical methods on a statistical basis, but as their drivers become more accurate and they become available at higher resolutions, they will surpass them in the foreseeable future.

Highlights

  • Thermosphere models are used operationally mainly in the determination and prediction of orbits of active satellites and orbital debris, and conjunction analysis is becoming a major issue with the fast-growing number of objects in space

  • The best results over the entire 4-phase storm period are obtained with DTM2013 and TIEGCM-W, while the oldest model, NRLMSISE-00, is the least precise

  • Compared to the assessments presented in (Bruinsma et al, 2018), in which the same models except TIEGCM-W were evaluated using entire years of data, this study confirms that best results are obtained with DTM2013 and that NRLMSISE-00 is trailing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Thermosphere models are used operationally mainly in the determination and prediction of orbits of active satellites and orbital debris, and conjunction analysis is becoming a major issue with the fast-growing number of objects in space. The accuracy of the determination and prediction of ephemerides of objects in Low Earth Orbit (LEO; altitudes lower than 1000 km) hinges on the quality of the force model for atmospheric drag (Hejduk & Snow, 2018) This force depends, besides on satellite characteristics (Doornbos, 2011; Mehta et al, 2017), heavily on the highly variable, both spatially as. Additional metrics concern the maximum and timing of the storm peak density Evaluations of both SE and FP models are available for single storms (Forbes et al, 1987, 2005; Bruinsma et al, 2006) or several storms (Liu & Luehr, 2005; Knipp et al, 2017), or data of a specific satellite mission (Kalafatoglu Eyiguler et al, 2019).

Semi-empirical thermosphere models
TIE-GCM
Model assessment procedure
Selected density data
Metrics for model-data comparison
Storm-time assessment results
Findings
Summary and conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call