Abstract

The formation of a thermoset polymer network is a complex process with great variability. In this study, we used dissipative particle dynamics and graph theory tools to investigate the curing process and network topology of a phthalonitrile thermoset to reveal the influence of initiator and plasticizer concentration on its properties. We also propose a novel way to characterize the network topology on the basis of two independent characteristics: simple cycle length (which is mainly affected by the initiator amount) and the number of simple cycles passing through a single covalent bond (which is determined primarily by plasticizer concentration). These values can be treated in the more familiar terms of network “mesh size” and “sponginess”, correspondingly. The combination of these two topological parameters allows one to characterize any given network in an implicit but precise way and predict the resulting network properties, including the mechanical modulus. We believe that the same approach could be useful for other polymer networks as well, including rubbers and gels.

Highlights

  • IntroductionFiber-reinforced plastics, are rapidly being introduced into many areas of our lives and dramatically changing all constructional material industries [1]

  • Polymer composite materials, or fiber-reinforced plastics, are rapidly being introduced into many areas of our lives and dramatically changing all constructional material industries [1]

  • We considered polymer networks based on the phthalonitrile monomer p-SiMe2 PN

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fiber-reinforced plastics, are rapidly being introduced into many areas of our lives and dramatically changing all constructional material industries [1]. The properties of polymer matrices are much more sophisticated, and their influence is often underestimated. Matrix mechanical properties and their coupling with filler stiffness (which is usually hard to change) primarily determine the overall composite properties for the consumer, including static and dynamic moduli, elastic and brittle behavior, etc. The other two important contributors to composite material properties are the filler arrangement inside the matrix and filler–matrix interface properties, which are very sophisticated and widely studied nowadays, but these are out of the scope of our research

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call