Abstract

ABSTRACT This article analyses a subcooled compression-absorption cascaded refrigeration system (SCRS) in comparison with a standalone compression-absorption cascaded refrigeration system (CRS) based on thermoeconomic optimization. Three different absorbent solution/solution mixture-refrigerant combinations have been tested as working pairs in vapor absorption refrigeration system (VARS), whereas four environmentally friendly refrigerants have been utilized in vapor compression refrigeration system (VCRS). The total annual cost of the system is formulated using energy, exergy, and economic performance of the system and is minimized for optimal operational parameters by implementing five recent evolutionary optimization techniques. The effect of compression subcooling on various operational parameters of the cascaded system is reported. Amid all absorbent solution/solution mixture-refrigerant-refrigerant combinations, R290 combined with (CaCl2-LiBr-LiNO3)-H2O provides the minimum total annual cost of 13,164.8 US$ yr−1 and 15,401.9 US$ yr−1 for CRS and SCRS, respectively. Sanitized Teaching Learning Based Optimization (sTLBO) and Coyote Optimization Algorithm (COA) obtain the optimal total annual cost for most VARS-VCRS absorbent solution/solution mixture-refrigerant-refrigerant combinations. Though the coefficient of performance (COP) of an optimal SCRS is about 250% higher than its optimal CRS, higher compressor work results in a higher penalty cost for the optimal SCRS, which is almost 190% higher than the optimal CRS. A quick convergence is observed for sTLBO and COA.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call