Abstract

Operational quantum stochastic thermodynamics is a recently proposed theory to study the thermodynamics of open systems based on the rigorous notion of a quantum stochastic process or quantum causal model. In there, a stochastic trajectory is defined solely in terms of experimentally accessible measurement results, which serve as the basis to define the corresponding thermodynamic quantities. In contrast to this observer-dependent point of view, a `black box', which evolves unitarily and can simulate a quantum causal model, is constructed here. The quantum thermodynamics of this big isolated system can then be studied using widely accepted arguments from statistical mechanics. It is shown that the resulting definitions of internal energy, heat, work, and entropy have a natural extension to the trajectory level. The canonical choice of them coincides with the proclaimed definitions of operational quantum stochastic thermodynamics, thereby providing strong support in favour of that novel framework. However, a few remaining ambiguities in the definition of stochastic work and heat are also discovered and in light of these findings some other proposals are reconsidered. Finally, it is demonstrated that the first and second law hold for an even wider range of scenarios than previously thought, covering a large class of quantum causal models based solely on a single assumption about the initial system-bath state.

Highlights

  • The success of the classical framework of stochastic thermodynamics is undeniable

  • The reason is the measurement backaction of an external observer, who manipulates a small quantum system and thereby changes the process. This implies that any theory of quantum stochastic thermodynamics should be able to consistently treat the measurement backaction and is necessarily different from its classical counterpart [7]

  • Second and more an issue of technicalities, their approach was classical, used certain weak coupling assumptions, and they treated information and entropy differently by excluding correlations, which turn out to be crucial for our purposes. By overcoming all these assumptions, we do justify the framework of Refs. [17,18,19], but we provide a general and promising tool to study the emergence of thermodynamic quantities at the trajectory level without making explicit use of quantum measurements

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The success of the classical framework of stochastic thermodynamics is undeniable. It pushes the validity of the laws of thermodynamics far beyond their original scope, it allows to consistently describe the thermodynamics of small fluctuating out-of-equilibrium systems, even along a single trajectory, and many of its predictions have been verified experimentally [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The reason is the measurement backaction of an external observer, who manipulates a small quantum system and thereby changes the process This implies that any theory of quantum stochastic thermodynamics should be able to consistently treat the measurement backaction and is necessarily different from its classical counterpart [7]. Based on a rigorous notion of a quantum stochastic process or quantum causal model [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16], an ‘operational’ approach to quantum stochastic thermodynamics was constructed [17,18,19] It puts the experimenter in the foreground by explicitly including all external interventions (state preparation, measurements, feedback operations, etc.) in the description.

Quantum causal models
Autonomous model
Dynamical equivalence with a quantum causal model
Thermodynamic equivalence with the operational framework
Agreements
Thermodynamics at the unmeasured level
Conditional thermodynamics: the canonical choice
Ambiguities in stochastic work and heat
Comparison with other choices in the literature
Final remarks
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call