Abstract

This paper focuses on the thermodynamic cycle performance modeling and numerical investigation of a high Mach number scramjet with inlet pre-injection of hydrogen. The scramjet model used in this study was the Hyshot-Ⅱ engine model. Flight experiments using this model at high Mach number have been conducted previously, which provides a unique testbed for validating the computational prediction of supersonic combustion. A thermodynamic cycle performance model with inlet pre-injection was developed for operating characteristics studies of the scramjet engine. A set of three-dimensional Reynolds average Navier-Stockes (RANS) simulations of the reactive flow was performed with a 9-specie and 19-step kinetic mechanism for hydrogen combustion. The turbulence is modeled by k-ω shear stress transport (SST) turbulence model. The thermodynamic cycle performance analysis results indicate that inlet pre-injection can enhance the hydrogen mixing efficiency, and a small amount of advanced heat release can improve the overall thermal cycle efficiency. Detailed flow analysis from the three-dimensional simulation results indicates flow can be ignited in the first shock wave induced boundary layer separation (SIBLS) region. Inlet pre-injection enables the propagation of the flame toward the core flow compared to the throat injection. The inlet fuel pre-injection proved to be a promising injection method due to the higher combustion efficiency, elevated from 0.75 to 0.85, and higher specific impulse potential, increased from 1570 s to 1810 s. As the ER of inlet pre-injection increases within the examined range, the performance curve exhibits an optimal point. As the geometric compression ratio increases, the entire combustion process advances, leading to a significant increase in the performance potential of the engine. The comparative analysis of the thermodynamic cycle performance modeling and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling indicates the model shows a good prediction on the performance of the scramjet engine with the inlet pre-injection, with the same trend of performance curves and an error of less than 10 % compared to the numerical simulation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.