Abstract

This paper presents thermodynamic cycle analysis of mobile air conditioning system using HFO1234yf as alternative replacement for HFC-134a. Under a wide range of working conditions (Varying Condensing temperature, Evaporating temperature, Sub cooling and sub heating with Internal heat exchanger (IHX) and without internal heat exchanger) on simple vapor compression system, we compare the energy performance of both refrigerants - R134a and HFO1234yf. Result shows that without using an Internal heat exchanger, At lower condensing temperature (35oC), Mass flow rate increases about 27-32%, refrigerating effect decreases 22-25%, co mpressor work increases 4-6% and COP decreases about 3-5%. While at higher condensing temperature (55oC), mass flow rate increases about 35-42%, refrigerating capacity decreases 27-30%, and compressor work increases 8-13% and COP decreases 7-10%. Using an internal heat exchanger (IHX), these differences in the energy performance are significantly reduced. At lower condensing temperature (35oC), mass flow rate decreases about 18-22%, refrigerating capacity decreases 15-18%, compressor work increases 1-3% and COP decreases about 2-3% and At higher condensing temperature (55oC), mass flow rate decreases 23-28%, refrigerating capacity decreases 18-22%, compressor work increases 5-8% and COP decreases about 4-7%. The energy performance parameters of HFO1234yf are close to those obtained with HFC-134a at Low condensing temperature and making use of an IHX. Even though the values of performance parameters for HFO1234yf are smaller than that of HFC-134a, but difference is small so it can be a good alternative to HFC-134a because of its environmental friendly properties with introducing IHX.

Highlights

  • Montreal Protocol (UNEP, 1987) was adopted by many nations to begin the phase out of both Chlorofluoro carbons(CFCs) and Hydro Chloro fluoro carbons (HCFCs)due to their ozone depleting potential (ODP)

  • The growing international concern over relatively high global warming potential (GWP) refrigerants has motivated the study of low GWP alternatives for Hydro fluorocarbons (HFCs) in vapor compression systems [1-5]

  • H1K,is is the specific enthalpy at compressor discharge. These theoretical results reveals for the different parameters (Mass flow rate, COP, Pressure ratio, Compressor work)without heat exchanger as per following: Pressure ratio (PR) is about 4-9% less in R1234yf than R134a for low condensation temperature (35oC), while it is about 7-11% less in R1234yf than R134a for high condensation temperature (55oC)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Montreal Protocol (UNEP, 1987) was adopted by many nations to begin the phase out of both Chlorofluoro carbons(CFCs) and Hydro Chloro fluoro carbons (HCFCs)due to their ozone depleting potential (ODP). Today mobile air-conditioning system in passenger car contains a refrigerant, paying a major contribution to increasing the greenhouse effect andabout 30% of the worldwide emissions of hydro fluorocarbons arise from mobile air-conditioning systems. One of those refrigerants is R134a, with a GWP of 1430, extensively used in car air conditioning (banned in Europe for new mobile air conditioners according to Directive, 2006/ 40/EC). The main candidates to replace R134a in mobile air conditioning systems are natural refrigerants like ammonia, carbon dioxide, hydrocarbon mixtures - propane (R290), butane (R600) and isobutene (R600a), low GWP HFCs - R32 and R152a; and HFO - R1234yf, developed by Honeywell and DuPont [13-18]. Okazaki et al studied the performance of a room air conditioner using R1234yf and R32/ R1234yf mixtures, which was originally designed for R410A, with both the original and modified unit

Challenges with respect to stationary AC system
Thermodynamic Analysis
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call