Abstract

The present study focuses on doing a thermodynamic analysis of a desalination system that utilizes the humidification–dehumidification (HDH) process with semi-open-air (SOA) circulation. The HDH desalination system is a notable example of a developed system utilized for freshwater production. This system has the advantage of being able to derive its energy from solar sources. The categorization of desalination units is determined by the configuration of their components, the direction of water and air movement, and the kind of heating employed for each stream. The present study noted that the utilization of this particular air circulation strategy, while maintaining a constant maximum system temperature, leads to enhanced system efficiency when combined with water heating. However, no substantial impact was detected when this method was employed in conjunction with air heating (AH). Each type of HDH desalination system has a different ratio of mass flow rates (MFRs) for the streams. This means that the efficiency of the system stays the same, no matter how the air moves through the system. The examination of temperature and relative humidity characteristics in the environment has indicated that this particular desalination unit is applicable in places characterized by both arid and humid conditions. Furthermore, in both air and water heating modes, it has been observed that the system employing SOA circulation has superior efficiency when the environment temperature is elevated. In the context of water and/or air heating, when a specific value is assigned to the MFR ratio of the two streams, modifying the mode of air circulation does not have an impact on the overall efficiency of the system. It is shown in this article for HDH with air heater the highest GOR is attained at either FCR = 1 or FCR = 0, depending on the operational temperature of the system. Also The system clearly works at its most efficient (GOR = 3.4) when it's in a Semi-open-air mode (FRC = 0.77) and the temperature is 50 °C. On the other hand, the system efficiency is 2.94 when the air exchange system is closed (FRC = 1). In the same way, the overall efficiency is 2.88 if the air flow is open (FRC = 0).

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call