Abstract

The Co–Al–C ternary phase diagram has been constructed by combining ab initio energetic calculations with the CALPHAD approach, and the results have been compared with the Ni–Al–C ternary phase diagram obtained using the same procedure. In the thermodynamic analysis, special care was taken evaluating the expression of the free energy for the L1 2 and E2 1 structures. To treat these two structures as a continuous solution, the free energy was expressed using the (M,Al) 3(Al,M) 1(C,V a) 1-type sublattice model. Because of the lack of experimental data, the thermodynamic properties of the E2 1 structure were evaluated using the Full Potential Linearized Augmented Plane Wave method. The calculated results show that the E2 1 phase in the Co–Al–C system is in equilibrium with fcc Co, the B2-type intermetallic compound, and the graphite phase. This finding is in good agreement with previous experimental results. On the other hand, the E2 1 phase does not exist in the Ni–Al–C ternary system. The phase equilibrium of the Co–Ni–Al–C quaternary system is discussed, taking into account the two-phase separation between the E2 1 phase and the L1 2 phase.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.