Thermally distinct ejecta blankets from Martian craters

Abstract

Utilizing the Termoskan data set of the Phobos '88 mission we have recognized a new feature on Mars: ejecta blanket distinct in the thermal infrared (EDITH). Virtually all of the more than 100 features discovered in the Termoskan data are located on the plains near Valles Marineris. EDITHs have a startlingly clear dependence upon terrains of Hesperian age, implying a spatial or temporal dependence on Hesperian terrains. Almost no thermally distinct ejecta blankets are associated with any of the thousands of craters within the data set that occur on the older Noachian units. EDITHs also do not appear on the portions of the younger Tharsis Amazonian units seen in the data. The Hesperian terrain dependence cannot be explained by either atmospheric or impactor variations; Noachian and Hesperian terrains must have experienced identical atmospheric and impactor conditions during Hesperian times. Thermally distinct ejecta blankets therefore reflect target material differences and/or secondary modification processes. Not all lobate ejecta blankets are thermally distinct, but all EDITHs correlated with visibly discernible ejecta blankets are associated with lobate ejecta blankets. The boundaries of the thermally distinct areas usually follow closely the termini of the fluidized lobate ejecta blankets, even when the ejecta blankets show a high degree of sinuosity. Thus, the thermally distinct nature of EDITHs must be due to the primary ejecta formation process. The coupling of these thermal anomalies to morphology is unlike most sharp Martian inertia variations which are decoupled from observed surface morphology. Some thermally distinct ejecta blankets occur near otherwise similar craters that do not have thermally distinct ejecta blankets. Thus, wind patterns or locally available aeolian material cannot provide a single overall explanation for the observed variations. We compiled a data base of 110 EDITH and non‐EDITH craters ranging in diameter from 4.2 km to 90.6 km. There are almost no correlations within the data base other than occurrence on Hesperian terrains. We postulate that most of the observed EDITHs are due to excavation of thermally distinctive Noachian age material from beneath a relatively thin layer of younger, more consolidated Hesperian volcanic material. The plausibility of this theory is supported by much geological evidence for relatively thin near‐surface Hesperian deposits overlying massive Noachian megabreccias on the EDITH‐rich plains units. We suggest that absence of thermally distinct ejecta blankets on Noachian and Amazonian terrains is due to absences of distinctive near‐surface layering. Thermally distinct ejecta blankets are excellent locations for future landers and remote sensing because of relatively dust free surface exposures of material excavated from depth.