Abstract
The pipe layout design has a great effect on the thermal-hydraulic characteristics of earth air heat exchanger (EAHE) systems. So, in the current study proposed four new buried pipe design configurations; low to high to low, high to low to high, spiral, and circular, in addition to the straight or uniform for comparison. These five configurations are tested and analyzed experimentally depending on the thermo-hydraulic performance for summer cooling requirements with variation of Re in the range of 18041 – 40843. The results show that changing the uniform design of the EAHE with fixed pipe length enhances both the heat transfer process and pressure loss values. At the same operating conditions, the circular design has the best performance compared to the other ones. For all pipe shapes, the cooling effect increases with the increase of air Re. The thermal- hydraulic performance of the circular design pipe is higher than that of the other pipe designs. The highest coefficient of performance (COP) average values that can be obtained at Re = 18041 is 3.05 for circular shape and enhances by 48.08 % compared to uniform shape. The effectiveness of EAHE with circular shape is improved by about 3.52 % compared to uniform shape at Re = 18041. Spiral design is optimum design based on the Nu value which reaches about 48 with enhancement 12.56% and 0.34 % compared to uniform and circular shapes respectively, at Re = 40843. The hydrothermal performance factor is highest in the case of circular shape with value about 21.9 at Re = 21257. By increasing Re, the drawbacks of the increasing in the total entropy generation are reflected negatively on the exergy efficiency. The specific cost of the circular shape at Re = 40843 is the optimum value by about 0.7 $/W. Spiral and circular shapes have a decrease of CO2 emissions less than uniform shape by percentage varied from 2.93 % to 13.84% for decrease in the Re from 21257 to 40843. It is concluded that using EAHE with four new shapes is highly efficient in increasing cooling capacity and energy consumption in buildings.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
