Thermal degradation of EVA and EBA—A comparison. I. Volatile decomposition products

Abstract

AbstractThis is the first in a series of papers in which structural changes during thermal degradation of ethylene‐vinyl acetate (EVA) and ethylene‐butyl acrylate (EBA) copolymers are compared. EVA, containing 11.4 mol% vinyl acetate (VA) and EBA, containing 5.4 mol% butyl acrylate (BA), were pyrolyzed at 280°C in nitrogen for 30 min. In another series of pyrolysis, EVA containing 1.2, 2.2, and 11.4 mol% VA were treated at 150–190°C for 3 h. The volatile decomposition products were collected in cooled traps respectively gas bags and then analysed with GC‐MS and ion‐chromatography. EVA is rather labile. The main volatile decomposition product is acetic acid. A linear decomposition rate was found already at the lowest investigated pyrolysis temperature, 150°C. After 30 min at 280°C every 15th of the acetate side groups had been eliminated. EBA is much more stable to pyrolysis. Thirty minutes at 280°C resulted in a decomposition of one out of 1500 BA groups. Butene is the main volatile decomposition product. Ester pyrolysis is supposed to account for the degradation of both types of polymers. The big difference in reactivity is presumably due to conformational differences. The ester pyrolysis mechanism will result in random unsaturations in EVA and carboxylic groups in EBA. To a minor extent acetaldehyde is formed when EVA is degraded. According to the mechanisms suggested, carbonyl groups remain in the main chain. Contrary to what is reported for poly(butyl acrylate), no alcohol was formed when pyrolysing EBA. This indicates that adjacent acrylate groups are needed for alcohol formation. For both types of polymer, scissions of the main chain results in hydrocarbon fragments mainly. In addition, acrylate containing fragments are observed when EBA is degraded. EVA, however, does not give any acetate‐containing fragments.