Abstract

The observation of the Hanbury Brown and Twiss (HBT) effect with thermal light marked the birth of quantum optics. All the thermal sources considered to date did not feature quantum signatures of light, as they consisted of independent emitters that emit uncorrelated photons. Here, we propose and demonstrate an incoherent light source based on phase-randomized spatially entangled photons, which we coin thermal biphotons. We show that in contrast to thermal light, the width of the HBT peak for thermal biphotons is determined by their correlations, leading to violation of the Siegert relation and breakdown of the speckle-fluctuations interpretation. We further provide an alternative interpretation of the results by drawing a connection between the HBT effect and coherent backscattering of light. Finally, we discuss the role of spatial entanglement in the observed results, deriving a relation between the Schmidt number and the degree of violation of the Siegert relation under the double-Gaussian approximation of spontaneous parametric down conversion. Our work reflects new insights on the coherence properties of thermal light in the presence of entanglement, paving the way for entanglement certification using disorder averaged measurements.

Highlights

  • St to the standard Hanbury Brown and Twiss (HBT) effect with thermal light, for thermal biphotons, the quantum and the classical fluctuating-speckle pictures are not equivalent

  • We show that thermal biphotons exhibit a 2:1 HBT peak, as in the standard HBT effect, indicating their thermal nature

  • We consider the case of thermal biphotons, in which a source of size D is comprised of two-photon emitters, each having a characteristic size of d [Fig. 1(b)]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

St to the standard HBT effect with thermal light, for thermal biphotons, the quantum and the classical fluctuating-speckle pictures are not equivalent. The second-order coherence function g(2)(Δθ) exhibits an 2:1 HBT peak [Fig. 2(a), black dots], yet its width is determined by the size of the twophoton emitters rather than by the total width of the source.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.