Abstract

This paper explores the interpretation of discursive governmental ‘regimes of truth’ related to accounts of community involvement by personnel involved in a Health Action Zone. It is based upon in-depth interviews and follows the conventions of thematic analysis. The analysis identifies a range of narratives among the respondents that often privilege experience over aspects of governmental discourse that are seen as oversimplified and technical in nature. This points to the challenges involved in transforming governmental discourse related to community into meaningful policy and practice aimed at profoundly socially disadvantaged ‘communities.’ The paper contributes to understanding about the processes that generate and inhibit the success of community involvement for welfare policy. In overall terms, it may serve as a sociologically ‘sensitizing’ and theoretical contribution to debates about community and public policy.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.